Milestone 3: Intervention and Evaluation
The purpose of this PowerPoint presentation is to provide an opportunity to develop a community health nursing intervention and evaluation tool for your identified community health problem (described in Milestone 2: Assessment and Diagnosis) and identify the components of the nursing process as it applies to a community or population.
You are a Community/Public Health Nurse (C/PHN) working in your setting of choice. You have identified a community health problem and have analyzed the data collected from your windshield survey and assessment & diagnosis assignments (the first two milestones). You have decided on one nursing intervention and need your organization’s approval for funding of this intervention. Your leadership team has agreed to listen to your proposal.
Best Practices in Preparing PowerPoint
The following are best practices in preparing this project:
Grading Rubric: Caring for Populations: Intervention and Evaluation (250 points)
Outstanding or highest level of performance
Very good or high level of performance
Competent or satisfactory level of performance
Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
|Problem identification10 points||Presentation includes at least one slide that introduces the problem and significant findings in the community(9–10 points)||Problem is introduced but lacks support with findings(8 points)||Supportive findings discussed but problem identification not clear.(7 points)||Problem is not introduced and does not have significant community findings(0–6 points)||/10|
|Proposed intervention85 points||One community health nursing intervention is proposed that would address one or more of the major direct or indirect factors that contribute to the problem. Intervention includes specifics:*Where is this intervention taking place?”|
*Will it take place one time or multiple times?
*How will you reach your target population?
*How will you involve your target population? Will you collaborate with anyone (e.g., physician’s office, church, local resources, etc.)
CHN role? Is anyone else involved besides yourself (C/PHN)?
*What level(s) of prevention are you addressing?
*Community setting is clear.
|One intervention is proposed but is missing one or two specific details.(71–77 points)||Intervention is missing more than two specific details.(65–70 points)||Intervention is not proposed or insufficient.(0–64 points)||/85|
|Intervention justification and application of evidence-based literature30 points||Includes at least one slide that discusses why this intervention should be a priority based on two scholarly findings. Two or more quality references from professional literature are cited that clearly support your rationale.(28–30 points)||Includes slide stating why the intervention should be a priority. Two references cited but information in the reference may be biased or not directly relevant to your rationale.(25–27 points)||Intervention justification inadequate or fewer than two references cited.(23–24 points)||Lacks slide on intervention justification. No references cited.(0–22 points)||/30|
|Evaluation85 points||Presentation includes at least one proposed quantitative or qualitative evaluation method and desired outcomes. Long-term and short-term impact on your community if the intervention is “successful” discussed.(78–85 points)||At least one evaluation method described but lacks discussion on long and short-term impact on community(71–77 points)||Long and short term impact on community discussed, but evaluation method unclear.(65–70 points)||Presentation lacks clear evaluation method and future impact.(0–64 points)||/85|
|Summary20 points||Includes at least one summary slide that reiterates the problem and purpose of the presentation.(19–20 points)||Summary does not clearly reiterate the problem OR purpose.(17–18 points)||Lacks reiteration of problem AND purpose.(15–16 points)||Summary slide not present.(0–14 points)||/20|
|Overall presentation10 points||Presentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye and includes creativity. Font is easy to read.(9–10 points)||Presentation is accurate and covers most elements but lacks creativity.(8 points)||Presentation lacks flow and creativity or is difficult to follow. (7 points)||Presentation lacks any attempt at organization and comes across as chaotic.(0–6 points)||/10|
|Mechanics10 points||Includes title slide (1)Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. (3)|
References properly cited within the paper (2)
Reference page includes all citations. (2)
Evidence of spell and grammar check. (2)
|Title slide incompleteMinimal errors in grammar, punctuation and/or sentence structure noted|
Citations are present but not in correct format
References are present, with minimal errors in format
|Missing title slideMultiple grammar and punctuation errors noted|
|Title slide and citations are missingReferences are missing or incomplete|
No evidence of proof-reading prior to submitting paper